|
|
|
| Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
|
MinM
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 02:16 PM Original message |
| 'V' aims at Obamamania -- chicagotribune.com |
| Refresh | <0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| |
| Windy
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Its the same as the old V. I wouldn't read too much into it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| SnakeEyes
(72 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 06:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 16. Exactly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Butch350
|
Fri Nov-06-09 02:03 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 36. Give me a break.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Uncle Joe
|
Wed Nov-04-09 11:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 23. Did they use the term "universal health care" in the original while the nation was going through a |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Deja Q
|
Thu Nov-05-09 06:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 27. Back then, nobody needed to latch onto current, hot topic issues to try to tell a story... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Uncle Joe
|
Thu Nov-05-09 07:01 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 32. I don't believe they were trying to tell a story in this case so much as demonize by association the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
truedelphi
|
Sun Nov-15-09 07:23 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 42. Are you trying to say that those of us who are supporting |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
X_Digger
|
Thu Nov-05-09 07:56 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 33. Yes, they had the cure to cancer, etc etc etc.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Uncle Joe
|
Fri Nov-06-09 11:19 AM Response to Reply #33 |
| 35. Not cures for cancer, etc etc. etc. or miraculous healings, but specifically "universal health care" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RockaFowler
|
Tue Nov-03-09 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. This is crap |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Myrina
|
Tue Nov-03-09 06:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 15. Scy-fy has been running the original ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| TheWraith
|
Fri Nov-06-09 12:24 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 34. It was originally a story about the rise of a fascist movement in the US. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ellenfl
|
Tue Nov-03-09 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. the original series must have been prescient. this one does |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MinM
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 02:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. nut cases who circulate batty rumors on the Internet about the leader's origins and intentions... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| DJ13
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. A story so old it was written when Obama was graduating HS |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bertman
|
Wed Nov-04-09 12:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 24. I remember reading a book by Poul Anderson at least 35 years ago that featured |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| alc
(119 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. Taitz is preparing her next law suit |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| azmouse
|
Tue Nov-03-09 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. The original 'V' had comparisons to the Nazis, and was shown when Raygun was pres. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Deja Q
|
Thu Nov-05-09 06:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 29. As was said, no hot-button issues were vocalized by the aliens in the original miniseries. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
question everything
|
Tue Nov-03-09 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. No chance competing with CBS NCIS, NCIS-LA |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
get the red out
|
Tue Nov-03-09 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. So Hawaii is off planet now? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| makeanoise
(152 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. just remember this peeps.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MinM
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 03:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. Absolutely! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
IndianaGreen
|
Tue Nov-03-09 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. V is what it is. Putting an Obama spin on it is idiotic. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| RedCloud
|
Tue Nov-03-09 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Remember, remember the fifth of November! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
StopTheNeoCons
(402 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. V is more like the colonial conquering of America, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Deja Q
|
Thu Nov-05-09 06:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 31. Nonsense! We all know the simple fact: It's more like one of those ribald PETA productions... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MinM
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Nuance... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
NikolaC
|
Tue Nov-03-09 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Oh Puhleeze! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Mr. Sparkle
(656 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. I would have said it more resembles the Bush Administration. You couldnt say a bad word in the media |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Alcibiades
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. They rather explictly take aim at "Hope" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| DRoseDARs
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. Episode just finished, took aim at conservatives. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| baldguy
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 22. It's a parable that warns against the dangers of fascism. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
robertpaulsen
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. Not only was the Obama allegory there, it was clumsy. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Deja Q
|
Thu Nov-05-09 06:30 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 28. I never saw any intent to poke at Reagan either... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Mr. Sparkle
(656 posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. I have just seen the episode and have changed my mind, they are taking a swipe at Obama. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
XanaDUer
|
Thu Nov-05-09 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. It seems the same as the one from twenty years ago |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
psychmommy
|
Fri Nov-06-09 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. i enjoyed it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
truedelphi
|
Sun Nov-15-09 07:51 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 43. Law and Order opens up discussions that I approve of - and others that I don't. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
FrenchieCat
|
Sat Nov-07-09 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 38. I don't watch dumb shit....just cause someone says it's popular..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Butch350
|
Sat Nov-07-09 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 39. Sometime a rose is just a rose... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| conturnedpro09
(89 posts)
|
Sun Nov-15-09 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 40. The show is indeed anti-Obama, but so what? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Seldona
|
Sun Nov-15-09 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 41. I disagree. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| ShamelessHussy
(468 posts)
|
Sun Nov-15-09 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 44. too funny |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Nov 20th 2009, 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC