Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

'Most of them were corrupt and stoned on opium' (Afghan police)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Previous Thread Previous thread | Next thread Next Thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-04-09 07:53 PM
Original message
'Most of them were corrupt and stoned on opium' (Afghan police)
Background news story:

Killed by the enemy within

Five British soldiers shot dead and others critically wounded after rogue Afghan policeman turns machine gun on his colleagues as they relax in base

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/killed-by-...

'Most of them were corrupt and stoned on opium'

A senior serving soldier reveals how the Afghan policemen in Helmand are often a danger to the British forces they work with

Thursday, 5 November 2009


When I heard the news this morning, I thought "Christ, five in one go..." I was shocked and saddened – but I was not surprised that it had happened. I'm surprised it took this long.

We went out to Helmand to mentor the Afghan National Police without understanding the level they were at. We thought we would be arresting people, helping them to police efficiently. Instead we were literally training them how to point a gun on the ranges, and telling them why you should not stop cars and demand "taxes".

Most of them were corrupt and took drugs, particularly opium. The lads would go into police stations at night and they would be stoned; sometimes they would fire indiscriminately at nothing.

They had no understanding of the basics of what it means to be a policeman. We expected to be teaching adults at a certain level and then realised we would be changing nappies. Give them 20 rounds and they will hit the target once.

The first time I saw them I realised that they had almost no training; some of them had very little ability. Their uniforms were dirty and didn't fit. Their weapon-cleaning was non-existent.

They certainly didn't have a concept of being upstanding members of the community. They had no loyalty, esprit de corps or cameraderie. That should have been incorporated in their training. They did have pride – because of the power and status they felt.

How do you train this band of idiots and turn them into a force to be reckoned with if they have no sense of loyalty, no sense of belonging?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/most-of-th...
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
   Replies to this thread
   This is all so Vietnam.  bemildred   Nov-04-09 08:27 PM   #1 
   An Army of Bushes; An Army of Ws  Demeter   Nov-04-09 09:16 PM   #2 
   How long will it take to get out of this since we don't have a draft and the bad economy  amandabeech   Nov-05-09 12:51 AM   #4 
   Maybe the stoner police can't hit the target but once out of twenty rounds, but I'll bet they'd  bertman   Nov-04-09 09:36 PM   #3 
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-04-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is all so Vietnam.
Who is confused here:

"How do you train this band of idiots and turn them into a force to be reckoned with if they have no sense of loyalty, no sense of belonging?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-04-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. An Army of Bushes; An Army of Ws
It doesn't bear thinking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Nov-05-09 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. How long will it take to get out of this since we don't have a draft and the bad economy
is pushing more kids into the service?

Of course, none of the bad stuff hits the evening news, either.

Where's General Westmoreland and the body count when you need them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-04-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe the stoner police can't hit the target but once out of twenty rounds, but I'll bet they'd
hit it a lot more if they were in their Taliban insurgent gitup.

This would be funny if it weren't so tragic and almost an identical replay of our foray into counterinsurgency warfare in Vietnam.

It sounds like the Afghan police gig is a pretty good one. You get paid by the U.S.. You get to extort unarmed civilians. You get to come to work stoned. You get free target practice and aren't even required to be a decent shot. I'm guessing most of them have a night job working with the Taliban or the opium smugglers.

OUT NOW!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 22nd 2009, 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC